Face in a Crowd: New Portraiture
@ Ipswich Art Gallery, Ipswich
A face, a portrait, an image, a photographic representation
of a person; what can this say? Can a mere portrait tell you more than words?
Ipswich Art Gallery’s Face in a Crowd:
New Portraiture aims to question the idea of portraiture itself, using it
as a device to critique social norms and an images’ ability to express
individuality and identity.
Using portraiture, four artists create photographs, videos
and sculptures using methods of morphing and layering, to question the impact
of today’s fast paced, consumer and technology driven society. Though
unconventional, the works remain on a photographic plane, as they retain the
inherent stillness, which allows the viewer to read the images similarly to a
photograph; but transcend the more literal definitions of what constitutes a
standard print. Each of the artists in the exhibit use photography somehow,
whether is be a video still printed and re-sequenced in David Rosetzky’s videoWithout you, 2004, or more
conventional still methods such as Simon Obarzanek’s Untitled (80 faces). The exhibition also features artists such as
Denis Beaubois and Justine Khamara, offering up both video and photographic
sculpture to the viewer.
Justine Kamara’s sculpture, Erysicthon’s Ball, 2010 uses the Greek myth to question modern
societies vanity. The large spherical sculpture is made from ten thousand
photographs of a single person, shot from different angles to create a three
dimensional and obscured image, once it is collaged onto sphere. The subject
holds varied facial expressions, referencing the self-absorbed activity of
taking and posting a multitude of images of oneself. In which social media sites such as
Facebook, have resulted in an individualised attempt to control personal
representation and perpetuated the phenomena of self vanity.
Kamara’s photographic sculpture is the clearest example of
the hybrid use of photography and portraiture within the exhibition. It leads
one to revisit notions of post-medium (as discussed by Rosalind Krauss,
Geoffrey Batchen, Anne Marsh and other critics), in which photography
re-defines itself. The medium is hybridized with another such as photography
and sculpture or painting and the authenticity of the medium itself is
questioned, due to its erratic nature. Comparatively Rosetzky’s photo collages
also create a sense of depth, not as dramatically three-dimensional, through
the use of multiple images which are layered via sliced cut outs. Similarly,
the use of video and digital media, manipulated the language and foundations of
photography by altering the method by which the viewer digests content. The
temporal stillness of a photograph is retained so that only subtle movements
are noticeable and make us question the reality of photographic representation.
Overall, Face in a Crowd provides an
interesting window to critique contemporary society through the use of everyday
portraiture, which is intuitively readable and tied to notions of reality and
modern existence.
Sancintya Simpson
thorough, informed, but long
ReplyDeletesorry that was me: iason
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to read about how you felt/ what the viewer experiences looking at Erysicthon's Ball which looks like such an amazing artwork.
ReplyDeleteFor those of you who haven't seen it go to the website http://www.justinekhamara.com